In the pool
On February 22, 2014, Samira DS Frasch was ‘found’ at the bottom of her pool by her handyman, Gerald Gardner.
When police arrived Gardner immediately began saying things like, “he murdered her,” referring to her husband, Dr. Adam Frasch, who was three hours away in Panama City Beach. Was the handyman really so discerning as to realize that what initially looked like a drowning was actually a murder? Or was he already deflecting police attention away from himself? He knew Samira couldn’t swim. The most natural conclusion upon seeing her in the pool, sunk to the bottom, would have been to think she drowned, not that someone had murdered her.
While doing the autopsy, the medical examiner found a blow to Samira's head caused by a blunt object. She ruled out a golf club which the prosecution put forward as a possible instrument used. Georgia Cappleman was attempting to build a case around a jailhouse snitch's story who had told law enforcement officials that Dr. Frasch had struck his wife with a golf club. In fact, all Dr. Frasch had told him was that he played golf. (The snitch got out of prison, anyway, in exchange for his testimony.)
Yet first-responders didn't notice the blow to her head from the blunt force, nor the injuries caused by her fall to the hard poolside. It wasn't until the autopsy that they were discovered. So why did the handyman who 'found' her start talking about murder? The only person who would have known about the injuries to her head would have been the murderer.
Comments
Post a Comment